<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Value of Online Conversations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/</link>
	<description>Defining the convergence of media and influence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 01:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Pacheco</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-49245</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Pacheco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-49245</guid>
		<description>Great post Brian (actually the first I&#039;ve ever read of yours). I&#039;ve definitely seen a shift in the way websites/blogs are evolving their basic structure in terms of building tools that encourage readers to interact &amp; write comments that are smarter, meaningful and worth reading. I speculate this is one of the reasons why many or the early adopters and loudest voices or the web have embraced the Google+ platform. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Brian (actually the first I&#8217;ve ever read of yours). I&#8217;ve definitely seen a shift in the way websites/blogs are evolving their basic structure in terms of building tools that encourage readers to interact &amp; write comments that are smarter, meaningful and worth reading. I speculate this is one of the reasons why many or the early adopters and loudest voices or the web have embraced the Google+ platform. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeopleRank: You&#8217;re Already Indexed… Now what? &#124; PandoDaily</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-49217</link>
		<dc:creator>PeopleRank: You&#8217;re Already Indexed… Now what? &#124; PandoDaily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-49217</guid>
		<description>[...] I described how our online activity would eventually contribute to a social consumer hierarchy or PeopleRank that would one day align our online and offline selves. Now, you and I are already indexed, and our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I described how our online activity would eventually contribute to a social consumer hierarchy or PeopleRank that would one day align our online and offline selves. Now, you and I are already indexed, and our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Will Not Run Circles Around Facebook, But It Gets A +1 &#171; GetPaidNotPlayed.com</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-44047</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Will Not Run Circles Around Facebook, But It Gets A +1 &#171; GetPaidNotPlayed.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-44047</guid>
		<description>[...] &#116;&#111; a socioeconomic hierarchy &#111;&#102; sorts &#116;&#111; what I dubbed PeopleRank &#111;&#114; People Rank (sorry TechCrunch, that &#119;&#097;&#115; me.) &#116;&#104;&#101; idea [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#116;&#111; a socioeconomic hierarchy &#111;&#102; sorts &#116;&#111; what I dubbed PeopleRank &#111;&#114; People Rank (sorry TechCrunch, that &#119;&#097;&#115; me.) &#116;&#104;&#101; idea [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google will not run Circles around Facebook, but it gets a +1</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-43626</link>
		<dc:creator>Google will not run Circles around Facebook, but it gets a +1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-43626</guid>
		<description>[...] believed that the social Web will give way to a socioeconomic hierarchy of sorts which I dubbed PeopleRank or People Rank (sorry TechCrunch, that was me.) The idea is that everyday people would complement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] believed that the social Web will give way to a socioeconomic hierarchy of sorts which I dubbed PeopleRank or People Rank (sorry TechCrunch, that was me.) The idea is that everyday people would complement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google will not run Circles around Facebook, but it gets a +1 &#124; Big Marketers</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-43564</link>
		<dc:creator>Google will not run Circles around Facebook, but it gets a +1 &#124; Big Marketers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-43564</guid>
		<description>[...] believed that the social Web will give way to a socioeconomic hierarchy of sorts to what I dubbed PeopleRank or People Rank (sorry TechCrunch, that was me.) The idea is that everyday people would complement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] believed that the social Web will give way to a socioeconomic hierarchy of sorts to what I dubbed PeopleRank or People Rank (sorry TechCrunch, that was me.) The idea is that everyday people would complement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google will not run Circles around Facebook, but it gets a +1 Brian Solis</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-43517</link>
		<dc:creator>Google will not run Circles around Facebook, but it gets a +1 Brian Solis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-43517</guid>
		<description>[...] believed that the social Web will give way to a socioeconomic hierarchy of sorts to what I dubbed PeopleRank or People Rank (sorry TechCrunch, that was me.) The idea is that everyday people would complement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] believed that the social Web will give way to a socioeconomic hierarchy of sorts to what I dubbed PeopleRank or People Rank (sorry TechCrunch, that was me.) The idea is that everyday people would complement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A table for two &#124; Crowds and Conversations</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-36964</link>
		<dc:creator>A table for two &#124; Crowds and Conversations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-36964</guid>
		<description>[...] and face to face conversations of the real world, I will be immersed in online communities and online conversations.  But, how different is it really? We are social beings, we like to swap stories, share tips, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and face to face conversations of the real world, I will be immersed in online communities and online conversations.  But, how different is it really? We are social beings, we like to swap stories, share tips, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ugg boots</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-29234</link>
		<dc:creator>ugg boots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-29234</guid>
		<description>Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the write&#039;s unique point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go thosetp  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cheap-nikeshox.com/nike-shox-R5.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cheap-nikeshox.com/nike-shox-R5.html&lt;/a&gt;   sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the write&#39;s unique point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go thosetp  <a href="http://www.cheap-nikeshox.com/nike-shox-R5.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cheap-nikeshox.com/nike-shox-R5.html</a>   sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briansolis</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-20213</link>
		<dc:creator>briansolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-20213</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not the blog, but the shift from blogger to wordpress :) In fact, I have to fix posts going back years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s not the blog, but the shift from blogger to wordpress <img src='http://cdn.briansolis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  In fact, I have to fix posts going back years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a.k.</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-20185</link>
		<dc:creator>a.k.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-20185</guid>
		<description>&quot;Concurrently, we’re groomed to think that older posts are also aging in context and relevance.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;very interesting. but sadly you&#039;re proving your point with this blog. i just read two older articles on here and both have broken pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Concurrently, we’re groomed to think that older posts are also aging in context and relevance.&#8221;</p>
<p>very interesting. but sadly you&#39;re proving your point with this blog. i just read two older articles on here and both have broken pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Page Rank al People Rank — El blog de Javier Godoy</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-16430</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Page Rank al People Rank — El blog de Javier Godoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-16430</guid>
		<description>[...] (*) En ningún momento Kevin Rose utiliza el término People Rank. Está tomado de este otro artículo de Brian Solis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (*) En ningún momento Kevin Rose utiliza el término People Rank. Está tomado de este otro artículo de Brian Solis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Tamplin (techspian) « The Value of Online Conversations &#124; Brian Solis « Chat Catcher</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-12500</link>
		<dc:creator>James Tamplin (techspian) « The Value of Online Conversations &#124; Brian Solis « Chat Catcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-12500</guid>
		<description>[...]         Oldie but a Goodie -- The Value of Online Conversations [link to post] by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]         Oldie but a Goodie &#8212; The Value of Online Conversations [link to post] by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Véronique Rabuteau (veroniquerabuteau) « The Value of Online Conversations &#124; PR2.0 « Chat Catcher</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-5718</link>
		<dc:creator>Véronique Rabuteau (veroniquerabuteau) « The Value of Online Conversations &#124; PR2.0 « Chat Catcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-5718</guid>
		<description>[...] 2009-08-05T12:18:21&#160;         The Value of Online Conversations &#124; PR2.0 (July 17, 2008) [link to post] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2009-08-05T12:18:21&nbsp;         The Value of Online Conversations | PR2.0 (July 17, 2008) [link to post] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen, writer Membership Millionaire</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen, writer Membership Millionaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>Blogs are not going to go away. Didn&#039;t they say the same thing about newspapers and books? And look at the world today. And I also agree that taking the time to check out other posts&#039; comments can spark another topic of conversation. Issues have many different sides and it&#039;s always interesting to see what other people have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs are not going to go away. Didn&#8217;t they say the same thing about newspapers and books? And look at the world today. And I also agree that taking the time to check out other posts&#8217; comments can spark another topic of conversation. Issues have many different sides and it&#8217;s always interesting to see what other people have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Sheldrake</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-1701</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Sheldrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-1701</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re impatient, and quite right too! The spread of good ideas, the construction of wisdom, has always taken time. Years, decades, centuries; and rarely in a manner one could call efficient or optimal.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In previous times, one could attribute the slowness with which great ideas formed and then disseminated to the media available to them at the time. Now we have instant media, we want instant identification, acclamation and propagation. Yet this media is too effective - too fast and too free - so good stuff is lost in the noise. Yesterday&#039;s gold nuggets are buried in today&#039;s sediment.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Your frustrations are well articulated, and I can see now that I share them. In particular, the relentless emphasis on the &quot;now&quot; versus the &quot;five minutes ago&quot; implicit to the blogging platform needs analysis.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are several interesting aspects of this MarCom Professional network that are relevant to this topic, and I&#039;ll finish this comment by listing them...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1. The network is populated by real people, not displaynames. That means real people have to live with their posts and comments, and so are therefore more likely to think a bit more before putting fingers to keys.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2. The network is actually a bliki; a hybrid of a blog and a wiki. This enables collaboration on posts / content / points of view, with a sub-community of your choice if you like, and therefore does what you intend to &quot;fudge&quot; on Blogger.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;3. As the network continues to grow, I don&#039;t see why MarCom Professional shouldn&#039;t be able to use other non-time metrics for presenting content to members based on things like the degree of collaboration, the number of referring links and pageviews (either originating from within the network and from search engine results), the topic and the authority of the author... although don&#039;t ask me for an algorithm for this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re impatient, and quite right too! The spread of good ideas, the construction of wisdom, has always taken time. Years, decades, centuries; and rarely in a manner one could call efficient or optimal.</p>
<p>In previous times, one could attribute the slowness with which great ideas formed and then disseminated to the media available to them at the time. Now we have instant media, we want instant identification, acclamation and propagation. Yet this media is too effective &#8211; too fast and too free &#8211; so good stuff is lost in the noise. Yesterday&#8217;s gold nuggets are buried in today&#8217;s sediment.</p>
<p>Your frustrations are well articulated, and I can see now that I share them. In particular, the relentless emphasis on the &#8220;now&#8221; versus the &#8220;five minutes ago&#8221; implicit to the blogging platform needs analysis.</p>
<p>There are several interesting aspects of this MarCom Professional network that are relevant to this topic, and I&#8217;ll finish this comment by listing them&#8230;</p>
<p>1. The network is populated by real people, not displaynames. That means real people have to live with their posts and comments, and so are therefore more likely to think a bit more before putting fingers to keys.</p>
<p>2. The network is actually a bliki; a hybrid of a blog and a wiki. This enables collaboration on posts / content / points of view, with a sub-community of your choice if you like, and therefore does what you intend to &#8220;fudge&#8221; on Blogger.</p>
<p>3. As the network continues to grow, I don&#8217;t see why MarCom Professional shouldn&#8217;t be able to use other non-time metrics for presenting content to members based on things like the degree of collaboration, the number of referring links and pageviews (either originating from within the network and from search engine results), the topic and the authority of the author&#8230; although don&#8217;t ask me for an algorithm for this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deirdre</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-1700</link>
		<dc:creator>deirdre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-1700</guid>
		<description>Hi Brian, &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You make some really good points.  There&#039;s a lot of clutter in online coversations.  It just reminds me of how we have to sort through all of the noise with marketing in general,  whether it&#039;s online or offline (the web is no different). Regarding the point about asking someone how they are and then answering great no matter what they say...what a shame that people are like this by nature.  Conversations online are the best opportunity to really listen, focus and act appropriately.  I think what you are saying is really valuable and I will point many of my colleagues to read this blog post.  Thanks for always offering honest and candid views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian, </p>
<p>You make some really good points.  There&#8217;s a lot of clutter in online coversations.  It just reminds me of how we have to sort through all of the noise with marketing in general,  whether it&#8217;s online or offline (the web is no different). Regarding the point about asking someone how they are and then answering great no matter what they say&#8230;what a shame that people are like this by nature.  Conversations online are the best opportunity to really listen, focus and act appropriately.  I think what you are saying is really valuable and I will point many of my colleagues to read this blog post.  Thanks for always offering honest and candid views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lani</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>Lani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>&gt;What if we spent less time cranking out posts and more time joining, spotlighting and promoting the conversations that take place in the comments section, forums, and across social networks?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;This is a struggle for me and I take your article as a challenge.&lt;/b&gt;  Wonderful work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>What if we spent less time cranking out posts and more time joining, spotlighting and promoting the conversations that take place in the comments section, forums, and across social networks?</p>
<p><b>This is a struggle for me and I take your article as a challenge.</b>  Wonderful work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Metz</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-1698</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Metz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-1698</guid>
		<description>A lot of this post reminds me of alternative music in the &#039;80s and &#039;90s (think  The Clash, The Cure, Bauhaus, Nirvana, Radiohead) and how a lot of the music was a back and forth conversation between bands (and albums). These bands were literally echoing the little bombs that the band before them dropped.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Blogging and social media are a lot like that: just because a post is written at a single point in time doesn&#039;t preclude it (1) from being a touchstone (a la The Cure&#039;s &quot;Boys Don&#039;t Cry&quot; (2) from being a pertinent voice in the conversation, 11 years later (a la Radiohead&#039;s &quot;OK Computer&quot;). Think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of this post reminds me of alternative music in the &#8217;80s and &#8217;90s (think  The Clash, The Cure, Bauhaus, Nirvana, Radiohead) and how a lot of the music was a back and forth conversation between bands (and albums). These bands were literally echoing the little bombs that the band before them dropped.</p>
<p>Blogging and social media are a lot like that: just because a post is written at a single point in time doesn&#8217;t preclude it (1) from being a touchstone (a la The Cure&#8217;s &#8220;Boys Don&#8217;t Cry&#8221; (2) from being a pertinent voice in the conversation, 11 years later (a la Radiohead&#8217;s &#8220;OK Computer&#8221;). Think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reza</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Reza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>Dear Friend,&lt;br/&gt;A group of researchers at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, are investigating effects of Weblogs on “Social Capital”. Therefore, they have designed an online survey. By participating in this survey you will help researches in “Management Information Systems” and “Sociology”. You must be at least 18 years old to participate in this survey. It will take 5 to 12 minutes of your time.&lt;br/&gt;Your participation is greatly appreciated. You will find the survey at the following link. &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://faculty.unlv.edu/rtorkzadeh/survey&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://faculty.unlv.edu/rtorkzadeh/survey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This group has already done another study on Weblogs effects on “Social Interactions” and “Trust”. To obtain a copy of the previous study brief report of findings you can email Reza Vaezi at reza.vaezi@yahoo.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Friend,<br />A group of researchers at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, are investigating effects of Weblogs on “Social Capital”. Therefore, they have designed an online survey. By participating in this survey you will help researches in “Management Information Systems” and “Sociology”. You must be at least 18 years old to participate in this survey. It will take 5 to 12 minutes of your time.<br />Your participation is greatly appreciated. You will find the survey at the following link. <a HREF="http://faculty.unlv.edu/rtorkzadeh/survey" REL="nofollow">http://faculty.unlv.edu/rtorkzadeh/survey</a><br />This group has already done another study on Weblogs effects on “Social Interactions” and “Trust”. To obtain a copy of the previous study brief report of findings you can email Reza Vaezi at <a href="mailto:reza.vaezi@yahoo.com">reza.vaezi@yahoo.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jitendra</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2008/01/value-of-online-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jitendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2008/01/17/the-value-of-online-conversations/#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>Great Piece Brian...Intersting that you mention the incentives issue. I think incentives are indeed at the root of the 90-9-1 rule (see here http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html)&lt;br/&gt;and fixing the perverse incentives is the most important thing we can do with the democratic media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Piece Brian&#8230;Intersting that you mention the incentives issue. I think incentives are indeed at the root of the 90-9-1 rule (see here <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html</a>)<br />and fixing the perverse incentives is the most important thing we can do with the democratic media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/24 queries in 0.570 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 606/608 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.briansolis.com

Served from: www.briansolis.com @ 2012-05-21 01:31:32 -->
