<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Bowl 2009: And the Winners are&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briansolis.com/2009/02/twitter-bowl-2009-and-winners-are/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/02/twitter-bowl-2009-and-winners-are/</link>
	<description>Defining the convergence of media and influence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:34:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: @annemai</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/02/twitter-bowl-2009-and-winners-are/comment-page-1/#comment-2632</link>
		<dc:creator>@annemai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2009/02/06/twitter-bowl-2009-and-the-winners-are/#comment-2632</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  Maybe next  year you can look at some demos of twitter participants vs. twitter base vs. other competitive stories out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  Maybe next  year you can look at some demos of twitter participants vs. twitter base vs. other competitive stories out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @SocialJulio</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/02/twitter-bowl-2009-and-winners-are/comment-page-1/#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>@SocialJulio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2009/02/06/twitter-bowl-2009-and-the-winners-are/#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>Interesting that your report did not find Denny&#039;s Super Bowl ad... but it was all over Google Trends.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think Brad Cohen got it right in this article:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Denny’s Free Grand Slam Super Bowl Fumble:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.cli.gs/DennysFumble</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that your report did not find Denny&#8217;s Super Bowl ad&#8230; but it was all over Google Trends.</p>
<p>I think Brad Cohen got it right in this article:</p>
<p>Denny’s Free Grand Slam Super Bowl Fumble:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cli.gs/DennysFumble" rel="nofollow">http://www.cli.gs/DennysFumble</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katy Barrilleaux</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/02/twitter-bowl-2009-and-winners-are/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy Barrilleaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2009/02/06/twitter-bowl-2009-and-the-winners-are/#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>Very interesting indeed. I participated in Twitter Bowl 2009 and really enjoyed it. Thanks Brian and crew for organizing it. While the tweets and Nielsen and other monitoring services were trying to measure preference and/or recall, I looked at Google Trends shortly after the superbowl to see which spots were the most popular based on search. And Google&#039;s #1 spot did not even make anyone else&#039;s list--the Jack-in-the-Box spot. You can catch my full post &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://katybarrilleaux.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/top-5-superbowl-ads-according-to-google/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting indeed. I participated in Twitter Bowl 2009 and really enjoyed it. Thanks Brian and crew for organizing it. While the tweets and Nielsen and other monitoring services were trying to measure preference and/or recall, I looked at Google Trends shortly after the superbowl to see which spots were the most popular based on search. And Google&#8217;s #1 spot did not even make anyone else&#8217;s list&#8211;the Jack-in-the-Box spot. You can catch my full post <a HREF="http://katybarrilleaux.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/top-5-superbowl-ads-according-to-google/" REL="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @tweepl</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/02/twitter-bowl-2009-and-winners-are/comment-page-1/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>@tweepl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.83.183/2009/02/06/twitter-bowl-2009-and-the-winners-are/#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article.  Indeed Twitter is still driven by the left of the adoption curve in the USA but I think the UK is cresting now as the Twitter seems to pop up everywehre on TV and radio every day now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article.  Indeed Twitter is still driven by the left of the adoption curve in the USA but I think the UK is cresting now as the Twitter seems to pop up everywehre on TV and radio every day now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 328/332 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.briansolis.com

Served from: www.briansolis.com @ 2012-02-09 12:12:40 -->
