<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Second Life of Second Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/</link>
	<description>Defining the convergence of media and influence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:02:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Second Life or Touching Life: Can They Both Work? &#124; Tiger Two</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-35344</link>
		<dc:creator>Second Life or Touching Life: Can They Both Work? &#124; Tiger Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-35344</guid>
		<description>[...] to a recent report, it seems Second Life didn&#8217;t disappear at all. In fact, it appears to be going from strength [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to a recent report, it seems Second Life didn&#8217;t disappear at all. In fact, it appears to be going from strength [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branded Virtual Goods and What Good They Can Do</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-34420</link>
		<dc:creator>Branded Virtual Goods and What Good They Can Do</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-34420</guid>
		<description>[...] last week, brands such as Volvo, H&amp;M, and MTV Networks are entering the virtual goods market. Virtual goods are non-physical products that people buy for use in online communities or games. They usually cost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last week, brands such as Volvo, H&amp;M, and MTV Networks are entering the virtual goods market. Virtual goods are non-physical products that people buy for use in online communities or games. They usually cost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sosiale medier &#8211; profittjag eller oppriktig kommunikasjon? &#171; Geirhaugsdal&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-34233</link>
		<dc:creator>Sosiale medier &#8211; profittjag eller oppriktig kommunikasjon? &#171; Geirhaugsdal&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-34233</guid>
		<description>[...] last week, brands such as Volvo, H&amp;M and MTV Networks are entering the virtual goods market. Virtual goods are non-physical products that people buy for use in online communities or games. They usually cost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last week, brands such as Volvo, H&amp;M and MTV Networks are entering the virtual goods market. Virtual goods are non-physical products that people buy for use in online communities or games. They usually cost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bumpercars1</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-28051</link>
		<dc:creator>bumpercars1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-28051</guid>
		<description>Go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://inflife.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://inflife.net/&lt;/a&gt; and get the SL Pop Viewer! Best viewer I have EVER used! You’ll be VERY happy with it, and you’ll never have to deal with those pesky slow logins and load times. The SL Pop Viewer completely blows away all other viewers by far!!! Go get it now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to <a href="http://inflife.net/" rel="nofollow">http://inflife.net/</a> and get the SL Pop Viewer! Best viewer I have EVER used! You’ll be VERY happy with it, and you’ll never have to deal with those pesky slow logins and load times. The SL Pop Viewer completely blows away all other viewers by far!!! Go get it now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greatest Hits of 2009 Part VIII &#124; Brian Swichkow&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-12468</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greatest Hits of 2009 Part VIII &#124; Brian Swichkow&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-12468</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. The Second Life of Second Life [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. The Second Life of Second Life [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM &#187; The Greatest Hits of 2009 Part VIII</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-12332</link>
		<dc:creator>JM &#187; The Greatest Hits of 2009 Part VIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-12332</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. The Second Life of Second Life [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. The Second Life of Second Life [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greatest Hits of 2009 Part VIII &#124; Brian Solis</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-12278</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greatest Hits of 2009 Part VIII &#124; Brian Solis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-12278</guid>
		<description>[...] to help us continue on our journey towards earned relevance.The Greatest Hits of 2009 Part VIII1. The Second Life of Second Life2. The Science of Retweets on Twitter3. Teens Adopting Twitter4. Social Media Accounts for 18% of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to help us continue on our journey towards earned relevance.The Greatest Hits of 2009 Part VIII1. The Second Life of Second Life2. The Science of Retweets on Twitter3. Teens Adopting Twitter4. Social Media Accounts for 18% of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Links at Fast Wonder: Online Community Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-10000</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links at Fast Wonder: Online Community Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-10000</guid>
		<description>[...] The Second Life of Second Life [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Second Life of Second Life [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briansolis</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-11510</link>
		<dc:creator>briansolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-11510</guid>
		<description>Jeff, I think overall what&#039;s most interesting to me is that SL is still an interesting phenomenon and an under appreciated and understood opportunity for study and engagement. But you&#039;re right, in the end, these numbers must be more substantive to truly invite me to spend more time analyzing their meaning. Although W. James Au seems to do great work: &lt;a href=&quot;http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2009/10/new-world-newsfeed.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2009/10/new-world-news...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I think overall what&#39;s most interesting to me is that SL is still an interesting phenomenon and an under appreciated and understood opportunity for study and engagement. But you&#39;re right, in the end, these numbers must be more substantive to truly invite me to spend more time analyzing their meaning. Although W. James Au seems to do great work: <a href="http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2009/10/new-world-newsfeed.html" rel="nofollow">http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2009/10/new-world-news&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff_molander</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-11509</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff_molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-11509</guid>
		<description>Brian...&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not that impressed -- honestly.  I&#039;m increasingly un-impressed at quantitative measures of the Web experience and in particular, social media.  You&#039;ve got a great summary here -- don&#039;t get me wrong.  And this is noteworthy.  But I think we read a lot of this -- day in and day out.  What about the quality of those text messages that get sent?  How many are commercial v personal, effective commercial messages, misplaced krass come-ons?  What about the quality?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;USA Today &lt;a href=&quot;http://budurl.com/l6wb&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://budurl.com/l6wb&lt;/a&gt; is breathless to shout the numbers but the social media realm isn&#039;t about quantity -- it&#039;s about quality.  From a user/consumer side to the MARKETER side too.  Yet all we do is throw money at banners on Facebook -- and ignore research that continually suggests what a waste it all is.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why?  Faux research like comScore&#039;s from what I gather: &quot;Twitter users spend 66% more dollars on the Internet than non-Twitter users!&quot; and similar drivel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Marketers seem committed to using social quantitatively -- mass communications.  Banners.  Talking &quot;at.&quot;  Not prompting for CONTINUED, systematic engagement that leads down the sales funnel.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just my thoughts but what am I missing here or just not getting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian&#8230;<br />I&#39;m not that impressed &#8212; honestly.  I&#39;m increasingly un-impressed at quantitative measures of the Web experience and in particular, social media.  You&#39;ve got a great summary here &#8212; don&#39;t get me wrong.  And this is noteworthy.  But I think we read a lot of this &#8212; day in and day out.  What about the quality of those text messages that get sent?  How many are commercial v personal, effective commercial messages, misplaced krass come-ons?  What about the quality?</p>
<p>USA Today <a href="http://budurl.com/l6wb" rel="nofollow">http://budurl.com/l6wb</a> is breathless to shout the numbers but the social media realm isn&#39;t about quantity &#8212; it&#39;s about quality.  From a user/consumer side to the MARKETER side too.  Yet all we do is throw money at banners on Facebook &#8212; and ignore research that continually suggests what a waste it all is.  </p>
<p>Why?  Faux research like comScore&#39;s from what I gather: &#8220;Twitter users spend 66% more dollars on the Internet than non-Twitter users!&#8221; and similar drivel.</p>
<p>Marketers seem committed to using social quantitatively &#8212; mass communications.  Banners.  Talking &#8220;at.&#8221;  Not prompting for CONTINUED, systematic engagement that leads down the sales funnel.   </p>
<p>Just my thoughts but what am I missing here or just not getting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briansolis</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-9955</link>
		<dc:creator>briansolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-9955</guid>
		<description>Jeff, I think overall what&#039;s most interesting to me is that SL is still an interesting phenomenon and an under appreciated and understood opportunity for study and engagement. But you&#039;re right, in the end, these numbers must be more substantive to truly invite me to spend more time analyzing their meaning. Although W. James Au seems to do great work: &lt;a href=&quot;http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2009/10/new-world-newsfeed.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2009/10/new-world-news...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I think overall what&#39;s most interesting to me is that SL is still an interesting phenomenon and an under appreciated and understood opportunity for study and engagement. But you&#39;re right, in the end, these numbers must be more substantive to truly invite me to spend more time analyzing their meaning. Although W. James Au seems to do great work: <a href="http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2009/10/new-world-newsfeed.html" rel="nofollow">http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2009/10/new-world-news&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff_molander</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-9947</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff_molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-9947</guid>
		<description>Brian...&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not that impressed -- honestly.  I&#039;m increasingly un-impressed at quantitative measures of the Web experience and in particular, social media.  You&#039;ve got a great summary here -- don&#039;t get me wrong.  And this is noteworthy.  But I think we read a lot of this -- day in and day out.  What about the quality of those text messages that get sent?  How many are commercial v personal, effective commercial messages, misplaced krass come-ons?  What about the quality?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;USA Today &lt;a href=&quot;http://budurl.com/l6wb&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://budurl.com/l6wb&lt;/a&gt; is breathless to shout the numbers but the social media realm isn&#039;t about quantity -- it&#039;s about quality.  From a user/consumer side to the MARKETER side too.  Yet all we do is throw money at banners on Facebook -- and ignore research that continually suggests what a waste it all is.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why?  Faux research like comScore&#039;s from what I gather: &quot;Twitter users spend 66% more dollars on the Internet than non-Twitter users!&quot; and similar drivel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Marketers seem committed to using social quantitatively -- mass communications.  Banners.  Talking &quot;at.&quot;  Not prompting for CONTINUED, systematic engagement that leads down the sales funnel.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just my thoughts but what am I missing here or just not getting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian&#8230;<br />I&#39;m not that impressed &#8212; honestly.  I&#39;m increasingly un-impressed at quantitative measures of the Web experience and in particular, social media.  You&#39;ve got a great summary here &#8212; don&#39;t get me wrong.  And this is noteworthy.  But I think we read a lot of this &#8212; day in and day out.  What about the quality of those text messages that get sent?  How many are commercial v personal, effective commercial messages, misplaced krass come-ons?  What about the quality?</p>
<p>USA Today <a href="http://budurl.com/l6wb" rel="nofollow">http://budurl.com/l6wb</a> is breathless to shout the numbers but the social media realm isn&#39;t about quantity &#8212; it&#39;s about quality.  From a user/consumer side to the MARKETER side too.  Yet all we do is throw money at banners on Facebook &#8212; and ignore research that continually suggests what a waste it all is.  </p>
<p>Why?  Faux research like comScore&#39;s from what I gather: &#8220;Twitter users spend 66% more dollars on the Internet than non-Twitter users!&#8221; and similar drivel.</p>
<p>Marketers seem committed to using social quantitatively &#8212; mass communications.  Banners.  Talking &#8220;at.&#8221;  Not prompting for CONTINUED, systematic engagement that leads down the sales funnel.   </p>
<p>Just my thoughts but what am I missing here or just not getting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Imbres &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fresh From Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-9936</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Imbres &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fresh From Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-9936</guid>
		<description>[...] blog.Interesting update on Second Life (thanks @MegWheel ) http://is.gd/4w3em Powered by Fresh FromTwitter fresh, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog.Interesting update on Second Life (thanks @MegWheel ) <a href="http://is.gd/4w3em" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/4w3em</a> Powered by Fresh FromTwitter fresh, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wizard Gynoid</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-9937</link>
		<dc:creator>Wizard Gynoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-9937</guid>
		<description>perhaps this kind of impressive growth will silence those critics who delight in forecasting the failure of linden labs and secondlife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps this kind of impressive growth will silence those critics who delight in forecasting the failure of linden labs and secondlife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guru SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-9928</link>
		<dc:creator>Guru SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-9928</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Quem quer uma segunda&#160;vida?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ja havia muito tempo que eu nao ouvia com andava o Second life. Hoje pelo twitter eu fui levado a um post do Brian Solis com o titulo &#8220;The Second Life of the Second Life&#8221;. Brian traz algumas estatisticas alarmantes sobre o crescimento do nu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quem quer uma segunda&nbsp;vida?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ja havia muito tempo que eu nao ouvia com andava o Second life. Hoje pelo twitter eu fui levado a um post do Brian Solis com o titulo &#8220;The Second Life of the Second Life&#8221;. Brian traz algumas estatisticas alarmantes sobre o crescimento do nu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briansolis</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-9931</link>
		<dc:creator>briansolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-9931</guid>
		<description>Definitely very interesting to say the least...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely very interesting to say the least&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Second Life or Touching Life: Can They Both Work? &#124; TigerTwoTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-9926</link>
		<dc:creator>Second Life or Touching Life: Can They Both Work? &#124; TigerTwoTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-9926</guid>
		<description>[...] to a recent report, it seems Second Life didn&#8217;t disappear at all. In fact, it appears to be going from strength [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to a recent report, it seems Second Life didn&#8217;t disappear at all. In fact, it appears to be going from strength [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson Lima</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-9927</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson Lima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-9927</guid>
		<description>Brian Solis has some interesting stats on second life</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Solis has some interesting stats on second life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtual Worlds News &#187; Archive du blog &#187; Grosse actualité pour Second Life</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-9923</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtual Worlds News &#187; Archive du blog &#187; Grosse actualité pour Second Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-9923</guid>
		<description>[...] Et puisque l&#8217;on parle du nouveau CEO, Mark Kingdom, ce dernier vient de publier une interview intéressante où il parle de la bonne santé financière de sa société et confirme qu&#8217;ils travaillent sur une version mobile bridée de SL : Linden Lab CEO describes Second Life&#8217;s enterprise growth and plans for mobile. Preuve de la bonne santé de SL, cet article de Brian Solis (le pape des RP 2.0) : The Second Life of Second Life. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Et puisque l&#8217;on parle du nouveau CEO, Mark Kingdom, ce dernier vient de publier une interview intéressante où il parle de la bonne santé financière de sa société et confirme qu&#8217;ils travaillent sur une version mobile bridée de SL : Linden Lab CEO describes Second Life&#8217;s enterprise growth and plans for mobile. Preuve de la bonne santé de SL, cet article de Brian Solis (le pape des RP 2.0) : The Second Life of Second Life. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grosse actualité pour Second Life &#62; FredCavazza.net</title>
		<link>http://www.briansolis.com/2009/10/the-second-life-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-9922</link>
		<dc:creator>Grosse actualité pour Second Life &#62; FredCavazza.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansolis.com/?p=9666#comment-9922</guid>
		<description>[...] Et puisque l&#8217;on parle du nouveau CEO, Mark Kingdom, ce dernier vient de publier une interview intéressante où il parle de la bonne santé financière de sa société et confirme qu&#8217;ils travaillent sur une version mobile bridée de SL : Linden Lab CEO describes Second Life&#8217;s enterprise growth and plans for mobile. Preuve de la bonne santé de SL, cet article de Brian Solis (le pape des RP 2.0) : The Second Life of Second Life. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Et puisque l&#8217;on parle du nouveau CEO, Mark Kingdom, ce dernier vient de publier une interview intéressante où il parle de la bonne santé financière de sa société et confirme qu&#8217;ils travaillent sur une version mobile bridée de SL : Linden Lab CEO describes Second Life&#8217;s enterprise growth and plans for mobile. Preuve de la bonne santé de SL, cet article de Brian Solis (le pape des RP 2.0) : The Second Life of Second Life. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 600/608 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.briansolis.com

Served from: www.briansolis.com @ 2012-02-09 11:20:14 -->
