Dissed by Santa, So Suggesting Resolutions Instead

by Cathy Brooks

Even though I’m pretty sure there isn’t actually a portly old dude in a red suit who slips down chimneys with presents, I wished pretty hard for something this Christmas.

It didn’t come.

Okay, so I’m Jewish and maybe that had something to do with the fact that Santa blew me off, but to be honest the problem isn’t what didn’t come … it’s what did and, as with all holiday merchandising, it started early.

It was about a week before Thanksgiving when the flood, really more like a tsunami, began – pitches, pitches and more pitches all seeking to set up a meeting with me at the Consumer Electronics Show. Here’s the thing, it was glaringly obviously that not a single one of them had taken a moment to even glance at the writing I do. If they had, they’d have seen that not only do I not review products, I don’t write about technology really at all. Okay, so I write about how technology impacts our lives from a social and operational basis, and I may talk about products that I use personally but even a cursory glance at anything I write - whether via a social media platform, blog or even radio – shows quite clearly that pitches proclaiming the latest release from pioneering-trailblazing-industry leading-superduperproductmojo company and asking to “schedule a meeting in booth XXXX to see the product” just aren’t a fit.

Here’s the problem. Every last one of these pitches was a mass mail, clearly a cut and paste of a generic pitch blasted out to the entire press list for CES. (Disclosure: I’m registered as media for CES 2010 through my involvement with the Intel Insider program.) In spite of the bulk mailing, most of them attempted to be jovial, overly personal and – in at least one case – almost inappropriately familiar in language, as if we were life-long buddies.

Now to be fair, I have worked on the PR side of the fence and know all-too-well the ferocious challenge of heading to a massive trade show with a client (or more than one client) tasked with the responsibility of securing press briefings. That is why every single pitch I received, yes every single one, got a personalized response that read something like this:

Dear XXXX,

First off, thank you for sending your pitch. I appreciate your outreach, and understand the Herculean task of scheduling press meetings that you face. That said, if you had taken a quick look at my work, or even just done a quick Google search on my name, you’d see that I don’t review products and don’t write about product or company news. What does interest me, though, is the way in which technology is impacting our lives, changing behaviors and that sort of thing. In other words – it’s not about the tools, it’s about what we do with them that I care about. If, with this information, you have a more targeted reason for why we should meet, then I’m all ears. If not, I wish you the best of luck with CES and a Happy New Year.

Best,

Cathy

That was nice, right? I mean, I can’t very well complain about people not giving me pitches that are a fit if I don’t give them some guidance, so I thought I’d use the opportunity as a teaching moment.

My mistake.

While there were a few thoughtful and grateful replies (none of which provided a more targeted pitch I should add), more than a few of the responses I got to my replies were, put simply, nothing short of an embarrassment for the communications industry. The responses ranged from snarky to downright rude. Some people were nasty. Some people failed to answer my questions or address my suggestions at all. In several cases, it was almost as though they were merely plodding through their pitching script having been told if their first pitch was rejected here is the thing to say.

Bad choice.

Like I said, the need for communications people to mass pitch large numbers of press and bloggers at major events is nothing new, but the sloppy manner in which such a massive number of communications people seem to feel it’s appropriate to achieve that goal was, put simply, shocking to me. I mean COME ON PEOPLE, shouldn’t we know better by now? Has no one been paying attention? In the last year countless things have been written – including a stellar view on how public relations has changed by Brian Solis – cajoling, educating and otherwise crying out for the communications industry to get with the program and realize that the world has changed – and that means adjusting processes and protocols that have been in place for years.

Yes, I realize that is tough, but at the same time there are any number of stellar communications professionals and agencies that firmly grasp the changes and are stepping carefully and resolutely down the path towards improving the way in which they leverage technology to do their jobs. As one example I hold up Edelman Digital as a group that really seems to “get it”. It doesn’t hurt that one of the leaders in the charge for that firm is Steve Rubel - a talented communications professional who spends ample time himself wandering the digital hallways of social media to keep his own perspectives fresh.

For the record, I also realize many of those pitching me were probably the low persons on the proverbial agency totem pole – junior account people with little experience who were tossed into the fray with little guidance. To those agencies who did this I say shame on you! By failing to mentor or teach your junior staff, you are perpetuating the problem. Hopefully along the way these junior staffers will have media and bloggers who provide constructive feedback as I did, but more often than not those pitches will either go ignored or – if they catch someone on a bad day – may result in their being flamed or verbally eviscerated. I know, because back in the day I was one of those hapless young folks and I recall quite clearly one conversation with a now very well-known writer (he was just starting out at the time) who ripped me a new one for “wasting my valuable time with a worthless conversation.”

Ouch. But you know what? I never did it again.

So while Santa didn’t heed my plea to staunch the flood of relatively worthless pitches, I’m proffering a clarion call to communications people for the New Year with my list of resolutions to consider. I’m avoiding a top 10 list, and not even offering 5, figuring that by giving only three hopefully people will adopt at least one:

1) If you’re doing a mass mail pitch – call it one: We ‘re not stupid. We know you have to toss lots of stuff at the wall for big events. So just call a spade a spade. Don’t try to be cute, funny or overly personal with people you don’t know.

2) Be prepared to go deeper: If someone does reply to your generic pitch and asks questions – answer them. More than likely it’ll pay off.

3) Do your homework: Okay so perhaps this one should be first and should actually preclude a mass mail, but taking a step back and doing some research on people will never steer you wrong.

Image Source: Shutterstock

Share/Bookmark
  • With the new job, I am now on the sending side of things, but am trying to not only make it personal and get to know the person I'm reaching out to, but am also trying to educate others on how to connect with Bloggers. And honestly, I just got an email from someone that said "Great meeting you at X conference in October..." Funny thing, I wasn't even AT that conference. Registered, yes. In attendance, no.

    Cathy--if someone responded to your response with an ask to meet/chat for a bit to actually get to know you in person, would you be open to that? And BTW--let's grab coffee soon. ;)
  • The short answer - absolutely. The bottom line is that as much as media/blogger folks like to complain about PR, the truth is that without them, the media/bloggers would have a very hard time. (without the *good* PR folks that is). It's an ecosystem, and symbiosis requires balance in the various parts ... PR/marketing serve a critical role - when done well.

    To answer your question in more detail, I'd probably do an initial chat by skype video because, frankly, I hardly have time to meet in person with the people I *need* to see, which includes friends & loved ones. So I've taken to using video chat for many initial conversations because it saves everyone time. If it's convenient to meet in person (we happen to be in the same area at the same time and schedules allow), then of course a cuppa joe in person *is* always best.

    Now as for you ... email me pronto and let's get coffee on the calendar :)
  • I loved this article. Quite hilarious and well delivered.
  • Thank you, Kristin. You're very kind to say!
  • Spot on, Cathy. Honestly, if I received your response to a blasted bcc email, I would've been delighted. Seriously. And I'd be damned if I couldn't find someone - client or not - that might be up your alley (Speaking of which... hah. Just kidding).

    Something else worth hitting on... There's such a reliance on "media databases" (think Bacons, aka Cison, conference lists, etc.). While these tools are useful to help PR folk locate sometimes-tough-to-find info like an email addy, they are abused in the sense that people use them to cast a huge net by doing a keyword search and including every result on to a list. And then blasting said list without knowing who's who. That concept of "playing the numbers game" is outdated and wrong - not to mention insulting to those "numbers." ;) With search these days, no one's a number - for better or worse.

    Quick story: I once helped a site called Thrive (David to Goliath Mint.com) get seen at SXSW. When we got the list, we dug through EVERY person's homepage, twitter feed, primary (and even secondary) media outlet, etc. From the tiniest blogger to Jenna Wortham. Yeah, it was time consuming as all get-out, but we made real friends because we treated press ladies and gets, bloggers - everyone - like real people. We found out what they thought was interesting... we found out what they liked in regular old life (again, search makes it easy). And we genuinely were interested as to what they were up to at SXSW and why. Did the cover us? Some. Not all. But we connected. And for down the road, we think that stuff helps.

    All the relationship-building information any PR person could ever want is out there - they just need take the time to go find it. What I do like is that people from both sides are talking about it. That's got to get us somewhere, right?
  • Yes, Dave. When conversations happen, movement can happen too. That's actually the premise behind my own blog, Other Than That (yes, shameless plug). Concept being, left is left, right is right and never the twain shall meet. The truth, however, always lies somewhere in the middle and finding that middle ground requires engagement and dialogue - precisely what we're doing here. Of course, theory would also go that the people most in need of learning something may not be reading this which is why I hope that in addition to the dialogue here that folks are taking the conversations to their own networks and spreading the meme and the topic!

    Those databases of which you speak are generally out of date by the time a final edition hits print ... back in the day when I *did* do some PR, the hard copy guides were WOEFULLY out of date. Today since almost all is online there is a bit more accuracy but with the sheer volume of outlets and individuals being tracked no sooner do they update then they go back and start again. Kind of like how they paint the Golden Gate Bridge. They never really finish. They start at one end and start painting. They get to the other end. And then start all over again.

    I don't know that we'll ever *solve* this problem, as there will always be shoddy performers out there, but hopefully we can make them easier to spot.
  • It's not a shamless plug until you post the URL. #JustSayin
  • briannelei
    Great blog and very insightful! I work for a boutique PR and marketing firm and find that we have a tendency to focus on both the perfection of the press release and completing the necessary research for the pitch. In fact, researching the pitch is the area that we now focus on more, having realized that wording in a release is not as important as directing the pitch to the appropriate source. My colleague even wrote a blog entitled "Playing the PR game" that focuses on pitching. His blog will be posted next week at www.braintrustlv.com/blog

    Have a great day and I hope you enjoy CES!

    Best,

    Bri
  • Appreciate your kind words briannelei ... working for a "boutique" firm you have a bit more of a luxury perhaps than folks who are at the larger corporate shops, no doubt. That said, I would think that even for the more bespoke type agencies heading to such a massive event, it's hard to avoid any mass pitching whatsoever. Trust me, I loathe mass pitches, but I'd definitely like to reiterate that I *get it* and don't mean to suggest that anyone who does so should be taken out back and shot. I do think, however, that being up front about it would work wonders and certainly taking ownership of it if called on it, should be de rigueur. Given a choice, one should ALWAYS do their homework - even in cases where that may seem a daunting task.

    One can only hope that Darwinism will come into play and at some point these sorts will be whittled out.
  • Great advice Cathy! For what it's worth, I didn't think you sounded angry or snarky, just fed up with stupidity!
    I'm always embarrassed by those in the PR industry who ruin it for the rest of us.
    Last year I had a client @ CES and I went through that task of pitching and setting up interviews, etc. It's not about quantity, but quality of results. I tried to select those reporters who did product reviews. Since I started my career on the journalism side, I'm always sensitive to respond to what the reporter's looking for, and try to train any junior staff to do the same. Sounds obvious to me, but I know there are those who don't do that. Anyway, enjoy CES and stay away from bad pitches!
  • Thanks for assuaging my concern, Debbie. :) Seriously though it's probably because even reading what I wrote I feel my blood boil and as I noted in an earlier reply to Rich, there is definitely a sense within myself of reviewing my own work - when and where have *I* been less than stellar in minding such details? We *all* do it at some point. We're all human and make mistakes. The key, I think, especially in an increasingly shrinking and always connected world, is that the need to be more and more mindful of the way in which we communicate in ALL scenarios can well become the diving line that separates those who succeed from those who don't.

    I'd say that your start in journalism is a key factor - I began my own career in newsrooms and in my detour through PR found that being able to put myself into the shoes of the media was invaluable. It also meant that clients and sometimes the agencies where I worked had issues with me when I would refuse to pitch a story because it WASN'T A STORY. I've always held that EVERY person who works in PR should do time in a newsroom, a believe that comes from something my father taught me. He was an architect, and he believed that in order to do his job he had to truly understand every aspect of construction from electrical and plumbing to concrete, wood working, etc... it made his ability to work with all of those people far better because he understood their work. Not a bad lesson.
  • Cathy - great post. As Nick points out, the CES list leaves much to be desired. But I'm still amazed that so many of my PR colleagues still don't know the value of a 'sorry, my bad' response to a journalist. Unfortunately there is so much pressure on the younger staff to produce but no pressure at all on them to develop and nurture relationships.
  • Thanks, David! I'd posit that while these folks may carry titles that would indicate they're "colleagues", their sloppy work puts them in a category far below folks like you who DO practice thoughtful and professional communication. They should strive to be peers with true communications experts.
  • pretty good post. PR firms really need to evolve or die, just like the media.

    http://themoneyspins.blogspot.com/
  • A-men!
  • Nick B.
    I was actually waiting for the punchline in your reply email, something to the effect of, "Best of luck sending irrelevant emails and hurting your reputation in the future," but it never came. The press list the CEA distributes leaves a lot to be desired since it's littered with ad reps, obscure analysts and ma and pa bloggers but sending one blanket release to all is like shaving with a machine gun. It's never the best option and will probably hurt you. A targeted, genuinely personal approach (maybe even referencing past work, GASP) will get a much closer shave with far less blood. Nick
  • Okay ... glad I had put down my coffee before reading that Nick because the chortling that resulted from your "shaving with a machine gun" analogy would definitely have resulted in a spill. :)

    As far as punch line, trust me ... it was in my head ... but my hope in replying wasn't to berate or belittle but to, as I said, try to provide a teaching moment. Many of those sending the pitches were, I'm guessing, super junior account folks with little to no experience and likely with no one mentoring them. (Which is the source of another rant against agencies that do their stuff SUCH a disservice... but I digress...) There were a few pitches the signature lines of which had titles like "managing director" "senior account executive" "account supervisor" -- THOSE are the truly disgraceful ones. Assuming the title is at least somewhat commensurate with their experience they should KNOW BETTER.

    I'm trying to do the whole "more flies with honey than vinegar" thing, but definitely find my blood boils quickly on this. It may have something to do with, as I noted in my above reply to Rich, that I have a certain level of guilt for having been sloppy myself in my own work at some point. On a psychological level I'm sure that's part of it. :)
  • Mark
    @Cathy: I've rarely had a teaching moment be received well. Every time I try to help direct them it falls flat. Same with customer support. We get so little feedback that anything, positive or negative, should be treated as vital information. Anyway, great post.
  • Ah the old "no good deed goes unpunished" thing, eh? I know it well. After publishing this post, I continued receiving a flood of pitches - and yes, all were mass mails and utterly mistargeted. This time around, I replied with the link to the post ... radio silence in all but two cases ... they replied ... with gratitude :)

    I'm determined to persevere and push along the path of trying to teach ...
  • Mark
    I never stop either. I think I'm hard wired that way. Good idea linking to the post. I hadn't thought of that. Thanks
  • Nice to "meet" a kindred spirit :)
  • It's unfortunate these stories are so common. I wish the practice of responding to pitches was scalable, as it does provide an opportunity to either correct including that journo/analyst or perhaps alter the pitch to fit that audience.

    The harsh reality is that us flacks are busy too. And sometimes our truly genuine, hand-typed emails come across as copied/pasted. But we're all trying to form the trifecta of addressing our needs, our clients' needs and journos' needs all in the same document. Sometimes we get it right. And sometimes we get it (very) wrong.

    Enjoy CES.
  • You can say that again, geekgiant, and as I mentioned I have done the job and so understand the challenge of heading to such a large show tasked with getting press attention and needing to rise above the cacophony - especially since in almost all cases the news is ... well ... not really even news. Like I said in my suggested resolutions - there's no crime in a mass mail. We all get that it's part of the game, but don't *try* to make it sound personal ... and regardless of whether a personal note or mass mail pitch, if someone replies and proffers some insight on how to better target your pitch to them at least have the common decency to reply ... politely.

    No one is perfect. We all make mistakes. Sometimes the processes by which we're forced to work provide a less than optimal scenario for communication. That said, own up to the error and try to have some accountability ...
  • Amazing contribution Cathy. It offers clarity in defining the difference between list builders and relationship builders and why the two may never meet. The former is only playing percentages (someone will publish it) while the latter would have thanked you and been more thoughtful in what they pithed. Good stuff.

    Best,
    Rich
  • Thanks, Rich. A friend of mine read the post and asked me why I "sounded so angry and snarky", and so I thought about that for a bit and realized that I take true offense to people who don't take pride in their work. Like I said, I've done this job before and I *know* it's not easy. I also know that it's generally a thankless job. At the same time, to be so sloppy really feels insulting to me ... insulting to those who *do* take pride in their work. I suppose if I dig down into my reaction far enough it's probably because I know that there have been times when I have certainly been careless or sloppy in my work. So it's a personal nerve too :)

    Appreciate your kind words, and hope that in some way this post may help at least one person change the way they do their job.
blog comments powered by Disqus

ABOUT ME

Brian Solis is globally recognized as one of most prominent thought leaders and published authors in new media. A digital analyst, sociologist, and futurist, Solis has influenced the effects of emerging media on the convergence of marketing, communications, and publishing. He is principal of FutureWorks, an award-winning New Media agency in Silicon Valley, and has led interactive and social programs for Fortune 500 companies, notable celebrities, and Web 2.0 startups. BrianSolis.com is ranked among the top of world's leading business and marketing online resources.

RECENT TWEETS

FLICKR FEED

  • Brand Reflection Cycle from the Book Engage
  • Wine Library TV: Engage Book Launch -
  • Wine Library TV: Engage Book Launch - Jessica Berlin
  • Wine Library TV: Engage Book Launch -