Studying the impact of innovation on business and society

The Evolution of Social Media and Business

Social Media is fundamentally transformative and is rapidly evolving the architecture of business, communications, and the dissemination of information and influence.

Today, there are businesses that engage in social media and those that do not. Those at least experimenting with the formidable, yet shifting landscape of intelligence and communication are learning how to adapt and connect in a new world of conversation, networking, and influence. Those that have yet to evaluate the opportunities and advantages for socialized marketing, service, sales, and branding will find it increasingly difficult to learn, adapt, and magnetize customers, prospects as well as their influencers.

As markets evolve, consumers gain a greater sense of adeptness and perspective. They too learn and adapt. In the process, individuals and the authoritative communities they form, possess a more sophisticated understanding of media literacy, community support, and prowess in new media communication. Consumers have choices and they’re increasingly practiced through natural selection.

There’s a sense of social Darwinism at play here and while it might sound overly dramatic, it is for better or for worse, true. In the new era of influence, those businesses that understand where and how to compete for the future will earn a genuine and advantageous position to shape and steer the perception, prominence, and impact of the brand. It is this idea of competing for attention where it is focused, as it evolves, that will help businesses connect with people and thus set a new, efficient, and effective foundation for advocacy and community.

In order to earn a place within online societies, we must first recognize where they’re emerging, flourishing, and thriving, and also how to engage through authentic and attested immersion.

Social Media: Reporting from the Field

Recently, the Center for Marketing Research at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth updated its annual study on the adoption and practice of social media by the Inc. 500, a list of the fastest-growing private companies in the US.

The essence of the report shares the tools that are carving the evolution of the fittest. At a minimum, Social Media is affecting and shaping the pillars of business.

The study found that most businesses recognize the importance of experimentation and engagement, with 91 percent of companies reporting the incorporation of at least one social media service or tool in 2009. Literacy and awareness was also on the rise with roughly 75 percent stating that they were now “very familiar” with social networking. This was reflective in the impressive drop in Inc 500 companies that did not use social media whatsoever, plunging from 43 percent in 2007 to 9 percent in 2009.

Messaging/Bulleting Boards

2007: 33%
2008: 35%
2009: 28%

Social Networking

2007: 27%
2008: 49%
2009: 80%

Online Video

2007: 24%
2008: 45%
2009: 36%

Blogging

2007: 19%
2008: 39%
2009: 45%

Wikis

2007: 17%
2008: 27%
2009: 25%

Podcasting

2007: 11%
2008: 21%
2009: 12%

Twitter

2009: 52%

This is the first year that Twitter was asked specifically, which is interesting considering that the network has been discussed as a business application over the last three years.

No Use of Social Media

2007: 43%
2008: 23%
2009: 9%

Social Media is indeed pervasive. Social networking, podcasting, blogging, and Twitter adoption are nothing less than profound. The number of Inc. 500 companies embracing these platforms and networks increased year over year, and most likely will do so in 2010 until we start to see the segmentation of targeted social activity in the networks that reach and connect niche markets or nicheworks.

The rise in the usage of wikis is encouraging. Even though 2009 numbers are slightly lower than 2007, at 92 percent, it is significantly higher than the 2008 reporting of 77 percent. Applications for wikis include user generated content, ideation, and governance, internal employee communication, as well as the organization of collective intelligence.

I am also pleasantly surprised at the growth in recognition of the importance of social activity within message/bulletin boards. In fact, when I conduct a listening and observation exercise to uncover where, when, how, why, and to what extent relevant conversations are transpiring using the Conversation Prism, messages boards and forums rank among the top of the list, in many cases, outperforming Twitter and placing second only to blogs in terms of consequence.

Not surprisingly however, video appeared to experience a small downward trend but 2009 activity still is significantly greater over 2007. What many either don’t yet realize or learn through a baptism by fire experience, online video requires much more than a Flipcam. Content must be engaging and entertaining. You literally have seven seconds to hold the attention of the viewer and without forethought, most videos are incredibly underwhelming. As such, content requires programming and creativity, much like the programming of any television network or motion picture company. We as consumers need something that captivates and holds our attention. Concurrently, online video also requires a dedicated content marketing strategy in order to connect the theme, essence, and value of the videos to those who could benefit from viewing them.

The Sociology of Social Media

The Center for Marketing Research observed that the Inc. 500 is outpacing the Fortune in many social media activities. In fact, respondents believe that Social Media is introducing a competitive advantage, with adoption ensuring survival and success through practice and evolution. As of now, the Inc. 500 documented success by measuring key, and not so important, indicators such as visits, impressions, comments, leads and sales leads and revenue.

As you interpret and process this information, it’s important to understand that the networks and adoption numbers aren’t necessarily reflective of the strategies you should integrate and pursue. Everything is specific to the behavior, activity, and locations of your community and thus requires an initial listening and observation exercise and audit to uncover the answers to the questions you may have or don’t yet know to ask.

This is why sociology prevails over technology when it comes to engagement. Essentially, brand managers become veritable digital anthropologists or sociologists in order to identify and document the culture of a community, gather information, analyze data, report findings, apply statistics and surface necessary communication and listening skills.

Our work subtly reflects that of a Margaret Mead or nowadays, Intel’s Genevieve Bell or Whirlpool’s Donna M. Romeo, Ph. D. – at the very least, we’re inspired by their work to apply their methodologies and learning in new fields.

While brand hierarchy isn’t necessarily established through social media alone, it is a highly concentrated and relevant amalgamation of integrated services, programs, and values that ultimately establish prominence.

Connect with Brian Solis on Twitter, LinkedIn, Tumblr, Plaxo, or Facebook

Get the new iPhone app

Read BrianSolis.com on your Kindle

Click the image below to buy the book/poster:



Image Source

259 COMMENTS ON THIS POST To “The Evolution of Social Media and Business”

  1. Tom Rau says:

    Dear Brian thanks for this interesting post.
    It is not surprising that the usage of social media services and tools has grown over the last years and will continue to grow in coming years.
    What I find most interesting, also from a researchers perspective, is the development of usage in the future.
    Right now it seems companies are often times trying multiple services and tools simply to be using Social Media.
    As you already point out Sociology determines where companies can successfully engage consumers. With currently so many services and tools available it will be very interesting to analyze which services and tools prove most effective for whom and why. Especially with regard to free services coping to make money to be able to survive.

    • briansolis says:

      Hello Tom! You are right. This is why research before action is so important. It tells us the location, size, and scope of our efforts, before we start.

    • Tom Rau says:

      Hi Brian. Very true. I think the POST model used by Josh Bernoff and Charlene Li in their book is a very good approach. It just gets you thinking from the begining, not somewhere in the middle.

  2. Very interesting data, thanks Brian!

    I assume that this research is US-centric?

    I'd be very curious to see how the rest of the world fares on similar questions – in my experience, the divide between companies that “get it” and choose to be active in social media channels, and those who still are either too wary or simply oblivious to the possibilities is huge over here.

    Here's to a 2010 filled with great online discovery for the businesses that haven't yet dipped a toe in social media!

  3. Roger Harris says:

    This well-thought out post offers real insight into the progress of social media as a key tool in a business's marketing kit. In particular, Brian was careful to refer to actually refer to processes of evolution, viz. the role of natural selection. As a trained evolutionary biologist (now putting such thinking into a business context) I am impressed when an author is able to articulate mechanisms and concepts behind the terminology, rather than just bandy around popular buzzwords to boost traffic. Well done, Brian.

  4. dmattcarter says:

    I found this incredibly interesting: “As of now, the Inc. 500 documented success by measuring key, and not so important, indicators such as visits, impressions, comments, leads and sales leads and revenue.”

    While companies are growing a bit more sophisticated in their adoption and use of social tools, their method of measurement lags significantly. Visits, impressions and comments can provide a blunt snapshot of who's been where, but it's difficult to correlate those measures to true performance across the organization. Leads and revenue is closer to true performance but, I'd argue that either they're imposing an artificial direct response mechanism into their social outreach or their missing several factors when drawing those correlations.

  5. dmattcarter says:

    I found this incredibly interesting: “As of now, the Inc. 500 documented success by measuring key, and not so important, indicators such as visits, impressions, comments, leads and sales leads and revenue.”

    While companies are growing a bit more sophisticated in their adoption and use of social tools, their method of measurement lags significantly. Visits, impressions and comments can provide a blunt snapshot of who's been where, but it's difficult to correlate those measures to true performance across the organization. Leads and revenue is closer to true performance but, I'd argue that either they're imposing an artificial direct response mechanism into their social outreach or their missing several factors when drawing those correlations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join the Newsletter

Sign up for the newsletter.

Stay Connected
Instagram
Twitter