Studying the impact of innovation on business and society

Calculate the ROI of Social Media

Guest Post by Jaap Favier, managing partner of The Small Circle

What is the secret of bars? Why do we happily pay four times as much for beer in a bar as in a store? We pay this brand premium to be with friends. The secret of bars is that they convert our quality time into cash. Like bars, social media are places where friends meet. The best social media programs also convert the consumer’s social time into a brand premium, reaching a return on investment (ROI) up to four times as high as the ROI of a TV commercial.

The time with friends and relatives is worth a lot to us. It’s worth our paycheck. A close look at the average bar tab or restaurant check—even the costs of a family holiday or yacht—reveals that we spend what we earn per working hour for an hour of time with friends. Pew Research data confirms this remarkable fact: an extra hour per week with friends makes consumers just as happy as an extra hour’s worth of salary. It makes sense: if we valued a working hour more than an hour with our buddies, we wouldn’t go to happy hour but stay at the office. Branded blogs, Facebook fan pages, YouTube channels,

Twitter accounts, and Pinterest boards serve as online bars, where:

Staff speaks to visitors.
Marketers promote the brand, just like waiters in a bar do. Some of the fans and followers listen but rarely pass the commercial messages along. As a result, the stream of service messages and sales promotions on sites like the JetBlue Twitter account offers the airline’s 1.7 million followers hardly any quality time.

Strangers introduce themselves.
Bloggers, tweeters, and vloggers use branded content to make a good impression on the strangers and acquaintances that come to their online venue. Some of the readers start a dialogue, and when it clicks, the blogger and engaged reader will often agree to meet face-to-face, according to a study by Technorati.

Friends converse with each other.
Consumers pick up branded content and “like” and share it with friends. Some comment and chat, often with close friends. TOMS Shoes, for one, feeds these dialogues on its Facebook page. The shoe brand gives one pair of shoes to children in third-world countries for every pair it sells. With daily footage of delighted children and articles about poverty, the brand gives fans food for thought and conversation.

A consumer, let’s call her Lucy, walks into a bar wearing her TOMS. The label on her shoes tells everyone what she stands for. She sits down with a friend, sharing the story of the brand’s benevolence. The TOMS label is a social signal in the offline bar. In online bars, fans and followers give the same social signals when they “like,” comment, share, retweet, and repin a brand. “Likes” are the new logos. When Lucy clicks on “Like” and comments “I love my new toms” on the brand’s fan page, she is telling her friends, neighbors, and colleagues who she is, what she stands for, and where she belongs.

Lucy’s contacts see her online signals. An acquaintance will take note, a friend may click on “Like” herself, and a close friend or relative may add a comment: “They look so good on you, Luz ☺” Lucy’s signals and the responses are directed at consumers, not at TOMS Shoes. But TOMS benefits big time from these peer interactions. A sociological study by the Rotterdam School of Management shows that after seeing Lucy’s signal, 7% of her acquaintances will consider the brand, and 42% of her close friends will want to own a pair too. Compare that to the mere 5% of consumers who get interested after they see a TV commercial: due to social interactions, consumers make an 840% leap of faith into the brand!

Each time Lucy and a friend share a brand experience, they invest time and trust. Each touchpoint between consumers represents value to the brand. That value is positive or negative, depending on the sentiment the two consumers exchange: a friend bashing the brand cancels out two “likes” by other friends. Either way, that value means money, because time is money for both consumers. Just like in offline bars, that value represents the brand premium both consumers are willing to pay. Add up the value of the thousands or millions of touchpoints between friends, acquaintances, and strangers in a social media program and you get the total brand premium that consumers are collectively willing to pay. By definition, this collective premium is the rise in brand equity: the return on investment of the social media program.

At the end of a successful evening, a bar owner keeps track of his ROI with hundreds of bar tabs. You as social marketer can do the same. To calculate the financial success of your social media program, you simply need to keep tab on the five factors that define the program’s ROI:

Number of touchpoints.
Count every time a branded YouTube video was downloaded, every “Like”, and every view of the company blog, every visit to the discussion forum. You don’t know how many fans saw your Facebook post or tweet? Thanks to research by people like Dan Zarella, marketers can make a pretty sound assessment of how many friends and followers digest their content and pass it along by tracking the likes-per-fan and retweet ratios.

Every tweet, retweet, post, comment, online video, pin, and repin takes a few seconds both to produce and digest. Deciding to click on “Like” takes the average consumer for instance seven seconds. In Facebook, an average eight close friends and twenty-six other friends will subsequently take five seconds to digest that “Like.”

Look at the intensity of the online interactions between consumers to assess how close they are. A good metric for intimacy is the comment-to-like ratios of Facebook fan posts: the higher these ratios, the more close friends shared the brand experience. On Twitter, the retweet-to-tweet ratio is a solid indicator.

Measure the shared sentiment between consumers by sifting through the comments and retweets. Companies like Radian6 offer natural language processing tools that automate this analysis for marketers. The word graph produced during such an analysis also serves to double-check the trust factor. Friends use words like “fun” in their exchanges, while close friends may use words like “moving” and “emotional.”

Social marketers know the demographics of their fans and followers, including the net income of senders and receivers of their content.

In social media, the time and trust between consumers boosts the effect on brands. Compare that to a consumer watching a Super Bowl ad: he receives a 30-second message from a marketer with a trust factor of 1. According to Nielsen, 33% of the 100-million odd viewers like the average Super Bowl commercial. Their average net income is $35,500 per year, or $0.21 per minute. All these viewers collectively invest:

The $3.5M return on investment isn’t a bad deal, since the going Super Bowl rate is $3.3M. The Small Circle has turned this formula into a ROI model that brands can use for any social media campaign or program. To test its validity, we applied the model to more than 50 well-documented social media campaigns and programs. A selection of the test results is shown below. Benchmarking the ROI of social media with the returns of a Super Bowl ad shows that:

1. The ROI of social media is up to four times as high as TV commercials. Consumers pass the branded content along and add trust every time they do.

2. Both large and small campaigns and programs can achieve high returns. The closer the senders and receivers of branded content are, the higher the impact on the brand.

3. In the most successful campaigns, consumers do the talking. Marketers don’t have the time to chat with every fan and consumers prefer to talk with each other anyway.

You are more than welcome to use this tried-and-tested interactive model to verify the ROI of your brand’s fan page, Twitter account, email campaign, Pinterest Board, or other social media activities. Download the model and find out how much money your social media campaign or program is making your company.

Bar owners collect their ROI from the till every night. Social marketers have a harder time converting consumer conversations into sales. Analyst Susan Etlinger from Altimeter Group shows that 70% of them don’t know how social media connects to revenues. To find out, she advices marketers to measure the route consumers take from social media to purchase with:

Tags and links.
How many followers clicked on the link in the tweet? How many readers followed the hotlink in the company blog post?

Platform apps and services.
Did the user of our mobile app scan our product in the store? How many non-fans read our post according to Facebook analytics?

Correlation analysis and A/B testing.
Do peaks in sales follow surges of “likes”? Do fans and followers behave differently than other customers?

Without answers to these questions, the ROI of social media is just a number. With the answers, that number becomes a valuable benchmark to measure your performance against the best-in-class campaigns. You uncover which investments will bring social marketing to the next level. You connect the dots and deliver the number.

95 COMMENTS ON THIS POST To “Calculate the ROI of Social Media”

  1. Sven says:

    Hi, why 21 cents per min? Based on what nr of average hours per working day (from what source is that info?) ? And why income per minute in the equation?



    • Jaap Favier says:

      Hi Sven,
      The source is US Bureau of Labor Statistics, who report that the average American spends 2800 hours per year working and commuting. I used income per minute to show that 30 seconds (the duration of the spot) is worth $0.11.

  2. IziggMedia says:

    As far as ROI is concerned why is nobody really talking about Mobile Media and Text Mobile Marketing? Mark Cuban says that Mobile drives Social!

  3. madonna machado says:

    One of the reasons I become a blogger was so I could learn but also help others learn to become a blogger . I might have a long way to go, since I became a blogger less then weeks ago . But I find these articles very helpful and I thank you . So on my way to becoming a successful blogger. All the best,

  4. Jaap Favier says:

    Dear Philip,

    Indeed, this ROI method sounds too good to be true. That’s why we tested it on 50 social marketing programs before we published it. We invite every marketer to put this method to the test as well. Download the interactive model, enter measurable consumer data, and compare the ROI number with the result of your program.

    I look forward to your findings.
    Kind regards,

    • Philip Sheldrake says:

      “and compare the ROI number”

      Call me a stubborn empiricist Jaap, but what exactly are your cohorts comparing?

      1) I associate some quantities to these variables, as fanciful as this will appear to any CFO / Finance Director
      2) I run them through the formula
      3) If I like what I see I shout about it (best keep quiet otherwise!)
      4) And I prove the output by ___________

      If they have to rely on this fabrication they have no other material means to ascertain ROI, so no comparison can be drawn to ratify the fiction. I don’t expect anyone to fill in the blank btw, it’s rhetorical.

      Again, please know that I support endeavours to demonstrate value, and in business performance management terminology to determine single- and double-loop learning, but this is obviously not the way.

      May I ask if you have approached anyone at AMEC, The Conclave, I-COM, or indeed the IPR to undertake a rigorous study of your technique? I have raised this post with AMEC and The Conclave but I don’t think they’ve mustered the energy to dive in here.

    • Jaap Favier says:

      Dear Philip,

      I’m delighted that you are investing your time and energy in this method. To answer your questions:

      The method was tested using social media campaigns and programs that have a known outcome in terms of increased brand equity and sales. The ROI of Evian’s Roller-Skating Babies is for instance fully measured, as you can see in brand manager Michael Aidan’s presentation on Slideshare.

      My reason for sharing the model is indeed to stimulate more rigorous testing of the method. Right now hundreds of PR and marketing experts are working with the model, and as they kindly share their results we jointly make this model better. Some of the users may cheer as they like the outcomes of the model, as you say, while others will be critical.

      The more constructive critique, the better. Thank you for also looking at this closely with an empirical/sceptical perspective. And thank you for sharing it with these expert organizations. If you would like to receive more details on the testing to date, please drop me an email.

      Kind regards,

  5. Hi Jaap

    Really enjoyed this blog and it has some cracking analogies.

    One question I have is around B2B social media and ROI. We recently held an event that – for an organisation our size – created a fair bit of ‘buzz’ on Twitter, but when using your model it asks for average income of target consumer. Our aim of this event was to get new business clients so how would that affect what we input for income of target consumer?

    Thank you

    • Jaap Favier says:

      Great question, Andrew.

      The analogy also works for B2B. In B2C we spend the most time with close friends, who have the strongest influence on our brand choices and purchase behavior. In B2B we interact mostly with our close colleagues and our manager, who certainly have a strong influence on our choices. This influence results from the fact that our business choices effect the success of our closest co-workers, and vice versa. “We’re in the company boat together.”

      When using this ROI model for B2B social media programs, substitute “close friends” for “close colleagues” and “consumer” for “prospect/customer”. The average salary is simply the average salary of your B2B prospects. After all, their working time is worth their salary (at least we’d hope so :)).

      Twitter is a great medium to create awareness and consideration in a B2B setting. To turn buzz into bizz, you want to give follow-up to the Twitter campaign, for instance by luring your old and new followers to your website and offering them some type of incentive to register.

      I hope this helps,
      kind regards,

    • Hi Jaap

      Thanks for that. Luckily for me I did just that!

      What I found to be interesting is how Twitter and Facebook responded different to our promotion of the event and also how that was reflected in the ‘buzz’ on both platforms. Our Facebook offering is tailored and meant for our gym members. Call it an extension of their social lives, and we then tailor that content for that platform. Our Twitter offering is totally different and is used as a channel to educate, support (through customer service etc) and as you said ‘turn buzz into bizz’.

      The model you provided demonstrates that perfectly, with little or no reward from Facebook (which for us is primarily B2C) but modest reward from our Twitter activity.

      I look forward to using this model more in the future and testing it out as we continue to develop our social offering.

      Thanks again.

  6. Ram says:

    Hi Jaap

    The great thing about your work is you have made the attempt at measuring ROI for social media. It can only get better as people test this out and provide more proof points to test the metric. I am in the business of banking where social media has had some impact but if you really strip the hype down banking and investment is not as exciting as dunkin donuts or starbucks. Banks have always struggled with the concept of marketing. If people ‘like’ a bank’s card and talk about it in social media how does it translate into more people buying the card. We do not go and buy credit cards everyday the same way we buy coffee or cola. A recent survey showed that social media is used for voicing negativity however when it comes to buying a financial product there is very little impact. Interested in your thoughts.

    • Jaap Favier says:

      Hi Ran,

      Thank you for your encouragement! Yes, after two years researching and writing this theory in my cave, I am very excited about the response and collaboration following this blog post.

      You’re right that most consumers get more excited about coffee than about credit cards. When you look at the excitement, though, it is not really about Starbucks coffee or TOMS shoes or Dove soap, but about their brand values community, benevolance, and self-esteem respectively. Financial services companies can generate similar excitement (and differentiation!) with their brand values. “Community” could translate into local sponsorships,”benevolance” into support of micro financing in the 3rd world, and “self-esteem” perhaps into a “real wealth comes from the inside.”

      One financial services company came back to me after downloading the ROI Model, showing an amazing ROI on their Facebook page, 20% higher than TOMS Shoes! The success was driven by fans “liking” and commenting on content about “family.” My company helps brands in finding such sweatspots for social marketing, using a methodology and the ROI Model to plan, execute, and audit success. Let me know if you want to discuss this further.

      Kind regards,

  7. Hi Jaap,
    I cannot say how hot is the topic of ROI in social media. I really appreciate your idea.
    One question: how do you take in account offline word of mouth that seems to be not inside this formula. When I “like” the superbowl ad i will talk to my friend as a “like” in facebook no ?
    Best regards,

    • Jaap Favier says:

      Hi Arnaud,
      You make a very good point. Indeed, the current version of the model doesn’t account for offline buzz. Popular models to calculate the value of the Super Bowl ad from organizations like Nielsen don’t account for this either. Therefore, i believe that this current version of the ROI model offers marketers a good basis to compare the returns of new media with the returns of old media.
      We would need more research to unearth the correlation between online word of mouth and offline word of mouth before the model could incorporate the latter. Ideally, such research would also include traditional media and the word of mouth it generates, so we can continue to compare apples and oranges moving forward.
      Currently 200 organizations are using this version of the ROI model. I am hopeful that their feedback will help to address your point.

      Kind regards,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join Our Mailing List

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Stay Connected